Animal Sciences at Sul Ross State University
Bachelor's Degree
Analysis
Starting near $28,000 annually puts Sul Ross graduates roughly $7,000 behind the typical Texas animal sciences graduate and $6,000 below the national median—a significant gap that matters when you're earning less than $30,000 per year. While the program ranks at the 40th percentile statewide (middle of the pack among Texas schools), it falls to just the 10th percentile nationally, and every comparable Texas program—from Texas A&M to Stephen F. Austin—delivers notably higher first-year earnings.
The debt load of $20,000 is slightly better than state and national averages, yielding a manageable 0.72 debt-to-earnings ratio. That means graduates aren't drowning in payments, but they're also not building much financial momentum on sub-$30,000 salaries. For context, Texas A&M animal sciences graduates start nearly $8,000 higher annually with similar debt burdens, creating substantially better financial positioning early in their careers.
The critical caveat: this data reflects fewer than 30 graduates, so outcomes could vary considerably depending on career paths and individual circumstances. If your child is passionate about ranching or agricultural work specifically in West Texas and values Sul Ross's location and accessibility (96% admission rate, serving a predominantly Pell-eligible population), this program provides a foothold. But if financial stability is the priority, the earnings gap compared to other Texas programs is too large to ignore, especially when the debt is comparable.
Where Sul Ross State University Stands
Earnings vs. debt across all animal sciences bachelors's programs nationally
Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.
Earnings Distribution
How Sul Ross State University graduates compare to all programs nationally
Sul Ross State University graduates earn $28k, placing them in the 10th percentile of all animal sciences bachelors programs nationally.
Compare to Similar Programs in Texas
Animal Sciences bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Texas (14 total in state)
| School | Earnings (1yr) | Earnings (4yr) | Median Debt | Debt/Earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sul Ross State University | $28,002 | — | $20,050 | 0.72 |
| Texas A&M University-College Station | $35,582 | $50,777 | $18,906 | 0.53 |
| Texas Tech University | $34,933 | $45,763 | $21,369 | 0.61 |
| Sam Houston State University | $34,051 | $39,422 | $21,745 | 0.64 |
| Texas State University | $33,358 | $40,091 | $21,662 | 0.65 |
| Stephen F Austin State University | $31,059 | $35,170 | $21,739 | 0.70 |
| National Median | $34,073 | — | $22,148 | 0.65 |
Other Animal Sciences Programs in Texas
Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Texas schools
| School | In-State Tuition | Earnings (1yr) | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas A&M University-College Station College Station | $13,099 | $35,582 | $18,906 |
| Texas Tech University Lubbock | $11,852 | $34,933 | $21,369 |
| Sam Houston State University Huntsville | $9,228 | $34,051 | $21,745 |
| Texas State University San Marcos | $11,450 | $33,358 | $21,662 |
| Stephen F Austin State University Nacogdoches | $10,600 | $31,059 | $21,739 |
About This Data
Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)
Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Sul Ross State University, approximately 52% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.
Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.
Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.
Sample Size: Based on 17 graduates with reported earnings and 20 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.