Median Earnings (1yr)
$46,954
75th percentile
Median Debt
$27,009
7% above national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.58
Manageable
Sample Size
149
Adequate data

Analysis

ASU's urban planning program delivers strong earnings right out of the gate—graduates start at $47K, placing them at the 75th percentile nationally for this field. With debt below $27K, the 0.58 debt-to-earnings ratio means graduates owe roughly seven months of their first-year salary, a manageable burden that's well below the national average for planning programs. The 12% earnings growth to $52K by year four shows steady career progression, though this field doesn't typically generate six-figure incomes early on.

Within Arizona's limited planning program landscape (only three schools offer this degree), ASU matches the state median for earnings while carrying slightly higher debt. However, comparing ASU's campus program to its own digital immersion version reveals identical outcomes—a detail worth noting if your student prefers in-person learning. The University of Arizona's program lags behind at $40K starting salary, making ASU the clear state leader despite its 90% admission rate suggesting relatively open access.

For families concerned about return on investment, this program checks the right boxes: low debt burden, immediate employability, and earnings that outpace most planning graduates nationally. Urban planning won't make your child wealthy quickly, but ASU's version provides a solid foundation in a growing field without the debt trap that plagues many bachelor's degrees.

Where Arizona State University Campus Immersion Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all city/urban, community and regional planning bachelors's programs nationally

Arizona State University Campus ImmersionOther city/urban, community and regional planning programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How Arizona State University Campus Immersion graduates compare to all programs nationally

Arizona State University Campus Immersion graduates earn $47k, placing them in the 75th percentile of all city/urban, community and regional planning bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in Arizona

City/Urban, Community and Regional Planning bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Arizona (3 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
Arizona State University Campus Immersion$46,954$52,445$27,0090.58
Arizona State University Digital Immersion$46,954$52,445$27,0090.58
University of Arizona$40,037$64,631$25,0000.62
National Median$44,146—$25,2370.57

Other City/Urban, Community and Regional Planning Programs in Arizona

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Arizona schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Arizona State University Digital Immersion
Scottsdale
—$46,954$27,009
University of Arizona
Tucson
$13,626$40,037$25,000

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Arizona State University Campus Immersion, approximately 30% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 149 graduates with reported earnings and 178 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.