Industrial Production Technologies/Technicians at Central Connecticut State University
Bachelor's Degree
ccsu.eduAnalysis
Central Connecticut State's Industrial Production Technologies program posts strong numbers—$74,889 starting and $84,550 after four years—that significantly outpace the national median of $59,822. Graduates carry just $18,750 in debt, well below the national median of $24,250, creating a debt-to-earnings ratio of 0.25 that makes the degree highly affordable. The program ranks in the 91st percentile nationally for earnings, suggesting it's among the best performers in this field.
However, context matters here: Connecticut has only two schools offering this bachelor's program, and CCSU's numbers match the state median exactly. This makes the state percentile ranking (60th) somewhat misleading—you're essentially comparing two programs. The real story is that this degree delivers strong absolute outcomes regardless of where you rank it within Connecticut's limited options.
The major caveat is sample size. With fewer than 30 graduates tracked, these figures could swing considerably with just a few high or low earners. That said, even if actual outcomes varied by 10-15%, this program would still offer solid value: graduates enter a technical field with immediate earning power and minimal debt burden. For a student interested in manufacturing and production technology, this represents a practical path to middle-class earnings from a relatively accessible state university.
Where Central Connecticut State University Stands
Earnings vs. debt across all industrial production technologies/technicians bachelors's programs nationally
Earnings Distribution
How Central Connecticut State University graduates compare to all programs nationally
Earnings Over Time
How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation
| School | 1 Year | 4 Years | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central Connecticut State University | $74,889 | $84,550 | +13% |
| Weber State University | $75,281 | $84,292 | +12% |
| Ferris State University | $78,820 | $81,758 | +4% |
| Lamar University | $84,746 | $80,134 | -5% |
| Shawnee State University | $57,682 | $79,938 | +39% |
Compare to Similar Programs Nationally
Industrial Production Technologies/Technicians bachelors's programs at top institutions nationally
Scroll to see more →
| School | In-State Tuition | Earnings (1yr) | Earnings (4yr) | Median Debt | Debt/Earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $12,460 | $74,889 | $84,550 | $18,750 | 0.25 | |
| $4,656 | $85,411 | — | — | — | |
| $8,690 | $84,746 | $80,134 | $37,672 | 0.44 | |
| $11,075 | $78,938 | — | $18,250 | 0.23 | |
| $13,630 | $78,820 | $81,758 | $24,250 | 0.31 | |
| $9,992 | $78,215 | — | $20,500 | 0.26 | |
| National Median | — | $59,822 | — | $24,250 | 0.41 |
Career Paths
Occupations commonly associated with industrial production technologies/technicians graduates
Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians
Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians
Nanotechnology Engineering Technologists and Technicians
Semiconductor Processing Technicians
Welders, Cutters, Solderers, and Brazers
Engineering Technologists and Technicians, Except Drafters, All Other
Non-Destructive Testing Specialists
Photonics Technicians
About This Data
Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)
Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Central Connecticut State University, approximately 35% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.
Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.
Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.
Sample Size: Based on 21 graduates with reported earnings and 27 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.