Median Earnings (1yr)
$32,817
34th percentile (60th in CA)
Median Debt
$8,424
6% below national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.26
Manageable
Sample Size
248
Adequate data

Analysis

CET-Watsonville's precision metal working certificate costs less than $8,500 and leads to $32,817 in first-year earnings—exactly matching California's median for this program. That 0.26 debt ratio means graduates need less than four months of earnings to clear their debt, making this a relatively safe credential investment even if the earnings aren't spectacular.

The challenge is the earnings ceiling. While graduates see modest income growth to $35,652 by year four, they're earning about $3,400 less than the national median for metal working programs and substantially below California's top performers like Santa Ana College ($45,864). At the 60th percentile statewide, this program performs slightly better than average within California but trails the national picture (34th percentile). That gap matters if your child could access programs in other states or better-performing California schools.

For students seeking immediate entry to manufacturing work in the Watsonville area with minimal debt exposure, this certificate accomplishes that goal efficiently. But if maximizing earning potential is the priority, the data suggests looking at California programs where metal working graduates routinely earn $10,000+ more annually—a difference that quickly overshadows the relatively modest debt savings here.

Where CET-Watsonville Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all precision metal working certificate's programs nationally

CET-WatsonvilleOther precision metal working programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How CET-Watsonville graduates compare to all programs nationally

CET-Watsonville graduates earn $33k, placing them in the 34th percentile of all precision metal working certificate programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in California

Precision Metal Working certificate's programs at peer institutions in California (87 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
CET-Watsonville$32,817$35,652$8,4240.26
Santa Ana College$45,864
The Fab School$39,592$36,707$4,4490.11
NTMA Machinist Career College$38,259$42,216$8,4180.22
Universal Technical Institute of California Inc$37,568$10,5930.28
Universal Technical Institute-Southern California$37,568
National Median$36,248$9,0000.25

Other Precision Metal Working Programs in California

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across California schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Santa Ana College
Santa Ana
$1,180$45,864
The Fab School
Rancho Cucamonga
$39,592$4,449
NTMA Machinist Career College
Santa Fe Springs
$38,259$8,418
Universal Technical Institute of California Inc
Rancho Cucamonga
$37,568$10,593
Universal Technical Institute-Southern California
Long Beach
$37,568

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At CET-Watsonville, approximately 23% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 248 graduates with reported earnings and 198 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.