Median Earnings (1yr)
$11,561
5th percentile (25th in CA)
Median Debt
$3,423
65% below national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.30
Manageable
Sample Size
120
Adequate data

Analysis

Coachella Valley Beauty College-Hemet produces some of the lowest first-year earnings in California cosmetology, with graduates starting at just $11,561โ€”well below the state median of $14,600 and ranking in the bottom quarter statewide. That's roughly half what top California programs deliver, and nearly $6,000 below the national average. While the program keeps debt remarkably low at $3,423 (compared to nearly $9,000 statewide), those minimal borrowing costs can't offset the earnings disadvantage in this field.

The silver lining is meaningful income growth: earnings jump 43% to $16,476 by year four, suggesting graduates eventually find steadier work. Still, even after four years, these alumni earn less than typical cosmetology graduates make in their first year. The school serves a predominantly low-income population (64% receive Pell grants), which may explain both the accessible pricing and the concentration of graduates in lower-wage markets.

For a student certain about cosmetology and needing an extremely affordable option, the low debt load limits downside risk. But families should recognize this program puts graduates at a significant competitive disadvantage in California's beauty industry, where better-performing schools exist at comparable or only moderately higher costs.

Where Coachella Valley Beauty College-Hemet Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all cosmetology certificate's programs nationally

Coachella Valley Beauty College-HemetOther cosmetology programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How Coachella Valley Beauty College-Hemet graduates compare to all programs nationally

Coachella Valley Beauty College-Hemet graduates earn $12k, placing them in the 5th percentile of all cosmetology certificate programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in California

Cosmetology certificate's programs at peer institutions in California (130 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
Coachella Valley Beauty College-Hemet$11,561$16,476$3,4230.30
The Salon Professional Academy-San Jose$24,660$24,953$10,3760.42
San Jose City College$23,253โ€”โ€”โ€”
MTI College$21,371$22,802$10,5500.49
Institute of Technology$21,184โ€”$13,3410.63
Shasta School of Cosmetology$20,144โ€”โ€”โ€”
National Median$17,113โ€”$9,8620.58

Other Cosmetology Programs in California

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across California schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
The Salon Professional Academy-San Jose
San Jose
โ€”$24,660$10,376
San Jose City College
San Jose
$1,366$23,253โ€”
MTI College
Sacramento
โ€”$21,371$10,550
Institute of Technology
Clovis
โ€”$21,184$13,341
Shasta School of Cosmetology
Redding
โ€”$20,144โ€”

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Coachella Valley Beauty College-Hemet, approximately 64% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 120 graduates with reported earnings and 147 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.