Median Earnings (1yr)
$30,536
36th percentile (60th in IL)
Median Debt
$27,000
At national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.88
Manageable
Sample Size
80
Adequate data

Analysis

DePaul's Design and Applied Arts program starts rocky but rebounds impressively. That first-year median of $30,536 lags both the national figure and most Illinois competitors, but by year four, graduates reach $52,942—a 73% jump that suggests the degree's real value emerges with experience. Among Illinois design programs, DePaul lands at the 60th percentile, trailing schools like Illinois State and UIUC but ahead of more than half the field.

The $27,000 debt load sits right at national norms and keeps the initial year manageable, with graduates owing less than their annual salary. This is crucial given that lean first year—you're not drowning in payments while building your portfolio and client base. The trajectory matters here: design work often requires building a reputation and network before commanding competitive rates, which explains why graduates who stick with the field see their earnings nearly double within four years.

For parents, the key question is whether your child can weather that difficult first year financially. If they can live frugally or have family support during the early career phase, this program offers reasonable debt and strong growth potential. But if they need to hit the ground earning immediately after graduation, the Illinois State or UIUC programs deliver better starting salaries for similar debt.

Where DePaul University Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all design and applied arts bachelors's programs nationally

DePaul UniversityOther design and applied arts programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How DePaul University graduates compare to all programs nationally

DePaul University graduates earn $31k, placing them in the 36th percentile of all design and applied arts bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in Illinois

Design and Applied Arts bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Illinois (28 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
DePaul University$30,536$52,942$27,0000.88
Illinois State University$39,287$24,9860.64
Judson University$37,466
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign$34,670$54,712$18,8390.54
University of Illinois Chicago$34,377$42,578$25,7500.75
Rasmussen University-Illinois$32,482$35,4381.09
National Median$33,563$26,8800.80

Other Design and Applied Arts Programs in Illinois

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Illinois schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Illinois State University
Normal
$16,021$39,287$24,986
Judson University
Elgin
$30,910$37,466
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Champaign
$16,004$34,670$18,839
University of Illinois Chicago
Chicago
$14,338$34,377$25,750
Rasmussen University-Illinois
Rockford
$13,546$32,482$35,438

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At DePaul University, approximately 31% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 80 graduates with reported earnings and 92 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.