Analysis
The $7,580 first-year earnings figure here looks alarming until you realize this program actually ranks in the 60th percentile among Puerto Rico's design programs—meaning the entire sector on the island faces dramatically different economic conditions than the mainland. With 83% of students receiving Pell grants, this school serves a predominantly low-income population navigating Puerto Rico's challenging job market, where design graduates typically start at wages that would be considered poverty-level by U.S. standards. The debt load of $11,250 is at least manageable compared to the national median of $26,880 for these programs.
The earnings trajectory from $7,580 to $27,344 over four years suggests graduates may need time to build portfolios and connections before finding stable work. While $27,344 still falls well short of the $33,563 national median, it represents significant growth within Puerto Rico's economy. The small sample size (under 30 graduates) means one or two outlier experiences could skew these numbers considerably in either direction.
For families considering this program, the calculation depends entirely on staying in Puerto Rico versus mainland opportunities. If your child plans to work on the island after graduation, these outcomes align with local market realities. If they're aiming for mainland positions, they'll likely face stronger competition from programs with better industry connections and higher earnings tracks—though the relatively low debt keeps the downside risk limited.
Where Universidad Ana G. Mendez-Gurabo Campus Stands
Earnings vs. debt across all design and applied arts bachelors's programs nationally
Earnings Distribution
How Universidad Ana G. Mendez-Gurabo Campus graduates compare to all programs nationally
Earnings Over Time
How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation
| School | 1 Year | 4 Years | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Universidad Ana G. Mendez-Gurabo Campus | $7,580 | $27,344 | +261% |
| Carnegie Mellon University | $66,274 | $126,932 | +92% |
| Northeastern University | $49,727 | $81,078 | +63% |
| The University of Texas at Austin | $44,506 | $76,309 | +71% |
| Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus | $52,694 | $74,666 | +42% |
Compare to Similar Programs Nationally
Design and Applied Arts bachelors's programs at top institutions nationally
Scroll to see more →
| School | In-State Tuition | Earnings (1yr) | Earnings (4yr) | Median Debt | Debt/Earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $6,920 | $7,580 | $27,344 | $11,250 | 1.48 | |
| $63,829 | $66,274 | $126,932 | $24,500 | 0.37 | |
| $68,237 | $64,846 | $56,391 | $18,262 | 0.28 | |
| $12,643 | $63,449 | $71,597 | $12,250 | 0.19 | |
| $13,747 | $57,615 | $68,882 | $20,000 | 0.35 | |
| $11,764 | $52,694 | $74,666 | $26,354 | 0.50 | |
| National Median | — | $33,563 | — | $26,880 | 0.80 |
Career Paths
Occupations commonly associated with design and applied arts graduates
Art Directors
Special Effects Artists and Animators
Web and Digital Interface Designers
Video Game Designers
Architecture Teachers, Postsecondary
Art, Drama, and Music Teachers, Postsecondary
Fashion Designers
Commercial and Industrial Designers
Set and Exhibit Designers
Interior Designers
Graphic Designers
Artists and Related Workers, All Other
About This Data
Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)
Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Universidad Ana G. Mendez-Gurabo Campus, approximately 83% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.
Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.
Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.
Sample Size: Based on 28 graduates with reported earnings and 35 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.