Median Earnings (1yr)
$61,297
48th percentile (40th in MI)
Median Debt
$25,500
10% above national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.42
Manageable
Sample Size
20
Limited data

Analysis

With fewer than 30 graduates in the data, treat these numbers cautiously—but the pattern suggests this program underperforms within Michigan. Graduates earn $61,297 after one year, landing below both the state median ($63,723) and the 40th percentile among Michigan's 18 similar programs. That's roughly $8,000 less than what Michigan State or Oakland University grads make, and even $2,400 below the national median. The debt load of $25,500 sits right at typical levels, resulting in a manageable 0.42 debt-to-earnings ratio, but the concern is the earning power itself, not the borrowing.

For a quantitative methods degree—fields typically valued for analytical rigor—starting nearly $2,500 below what peers at other Michigan schools earn raises questions about curriculum strength or employer perception. U-M Dearborn's relatively moderate selectivity and the small cohort size might signal that this program hasn't achieved the scale or reputation needed to compete with MSU or Oakland. The 44% Pell grant rate shows good access, but access matters most when outcomes justify the investment.

If your child is set on quantitative management in Michigan, the data suggests looking first at Oakland or MSU unless U-M Dearborn offers compelling non-financial advantages like location or specific faculty expertise. The small sample means one strong or weak graduating class could skew results significantly, but right now the numbers don't make a strong case.

Where University of Michigan-Dearborn Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all management sciences and quantitative methods bachelors's programs nationally

University of Michigan-DearbornOther management sciences and quantitative methods programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How University of Michigan-Dearborn graduates compare to all programs nationally

University of Michigan-Dearborn graduates earn $61k, placing them in the 48th percentile of all management sciences and quantitative methods bachelors programs nationally.

Compare to Similar Programs in Michigan

Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Michigan (18 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
University of Michigan-Dearborn$61,297—$25,5000.42
Oakland University$69,446———
Michigan State University$69,443$74,432$23,2500.33
Central Michigan University$66,149$75,013$24,2500.37
Northwood University$54,298———
Grand Valley State University$46,886$56,527$26,0000.55
National Median$62,069—$23,2500.37

Other Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Programs in Michigan

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Michigan schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Oakland University
Rochester Hills
$14,694$69,446—
Michigan State University
East Lansing
$15,988$69,443$23,250
Central Michigan University
Mount Pleasant
$14,190$66,149$24,250
Northwood University
Midland
$33,000$54,298—
Grand Valley State University
Allendale
$14,628$46,886$26,000

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At University of Michigan-Dearborn, approximately 44% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 20 graduates with reported earnings and 22 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.