Median Earnings (1yr)
$67,746
59th percentile
Median Debt
$23,500
2% above national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.35
Manageable
Sample Size
60
Adequate data

Analysis

UW-Madison's agricultural engineering program outperforms both the state median ($62,686) and national median ($65,396), placing graduates near the 60th percentile nationwide. Starting at $67,746 within a year of graduation and climbing to $72,632 by year four, students see steady earnings growth while managing reasonable debt of $23,500—translating to a debt-to-earnings ratio of just 0.35. Wisconsin has only two schools offering this degree, and Madison graduates earn about $10,000 more annually than their counterparts at UW-River Falls, making this clearly the stronger in-state option for agricultural engineering.

The numbers paint a straightforward picture of solid financial returns. With earnings growing 7% over four years and debt that represents barely a third of first-year income, graduates enter careers with manageable obligations and genuine upward trajectory. Agricultural engineering combines traditional farming knowledge with modern technology—irrigation systems, precision agriculture, renewable energy—creating demand across dairy, food processing, and sustainability sectors where Wisconsin's economy is particularly strong.

For families weighing an engineering path focused on agriculture and food systems, this program delivers competitive earnings with below-average debt burden. The moderate sample size (30-100 graduates) suggests adequate reliability without the oversaturation that can dilute outcomes. If your student is drawn to applying technical problem-solving to agricultural challenges, this represents a practical investment that balances solid starting salaries with Wisconsin's in-state tuition advantage.

Where University of Wisconsin-Madison Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all agricultural engineering bachelors's programs nationally

University of Wisconsin-MadisonOther agricultural engineering programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How University of Wisconsin-Madison graduates compare to all programs nationally

University of Wisconsin-Madison graduates earn $68k, placing them in the 59th percentile of all agricultural engineering bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in Wisconsin

Agricultural Engineering bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Wisconsin (2 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
University of Wisconsin-Madison$67,746$72,632$23,5000.35
University of Wisconsin-River Falls$57,627$54,619$23,0000.40
National Median$65,396—$22,9360.35

Other Agricultural Engineering Programs in Wisconsin

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Wisconsin schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
University of Wisconsin-River Falls
River Falls
$8,606$57,627$23,000

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At University of Wisconsin-Madison, approximately 15% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 60 graduates with reported earnings and 57 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.