Median Earnings (1yr)
$28,801
14th percentile (40th in SC)
Median Debt
$25,000
At national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.87
Manageable
Sample Size
53
Adequate data

Analysis

College of Charleston's sociology program starts slowly but demonstrates something uncommon: strong earnings momentum. That $28,801 first-year figure sits below both the state median ($29,438) and well below the national average ($34,102). Four years out, though, graduates earn $44,831—a 56% jump that outpaces typical sociology career trajectories and suggests graduates either develop valuable skills over time or successfully pivot into better-paying fields.

The $25,000 debt load is manageable and matches the national median. That 0.87 debt-to-earnings ratio means graduates can realistically handle their payments, even during that challenging first year. Among South Carolina's sociology programs, this lands squarely in the middle—40th percentile—performing comparably to USC Columbia but trailing Clemson and Winthrop by several thousand dollars. The program's relative weakness shows nationally, ranking just 14th percentile against all sociology degrees.

For families comfortable with a lean first year or two while their graduate finds footing, this program offers a reasonable path forward. The debt won't be crushing, and the earnings growth pattern suggests graduates do eventually find their stride. Parents should recognize, however, that their child will likely start behind peers from stronger programs and spend several years catching up.

Where College of Charleston Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all sociology bachelors's programs nationally

College of CharlestonOther sociology programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How College of Charleston graduates compare to all programs nationally

College of Charleston graduates earn $29k, placing them in the 14th percentile of all sociology bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in South Carolina

Sociology bachelors's programs at peer institutions in South Carolina (21 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
College of Charleston$28,801$44,831$25,0000.87
Clemson University$36,320$42,405$26,1250.72
Winthrop University$33,877$35,309$27,0000.80
Lander University$31,243$38,892$30,6220.98
University of South Carolina-Columbia$30,517$41,963$27,0000.88
University of South Carolina Aiken$29,438$35,125$28,7500.98
National Median$34,102—$25,0000.73

Other Sociology Programs in South Carolina

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across South Carolina schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Clemson University
Clemson
$15,554$36,320$26,125
Winthrop University
Rock Hill
$15,956$33,877$27,000
Lander University
Greenwood
$11,700$31,243$30,622
University of South Carolina-Columbia
Columbia
$12,688$30,517$27,000
University of South Carolina Aiken
Aiken
$10,760$29,438$28,750

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At College of Charleston, approximately 19% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 53 graduates with reported earnings and 63 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.