Engineering Technology at Miami University-Middletown
Bachelor's Degree
Analysis
Miami University-Middletown's engineering technology graduates earn $69,483 right out of school—$9,000 more than the national median for this field and enough to land this program in the 95th percentile nationally. That's a significant advantage in a field where many programs struggle to break $60,000 in starting pay. The debt load of $26,325 translates to a manageable 0.38 debt-to-earnings ratio, meaning graduates earn nearly three times what they owe. By year four, median earnings climb to $81,683, showing steady 18% growth that suggests strong career progression.
Within Ohio, the picture is more competitive. This program sits at the 60th percentile statewide, tied with Miami's Oxford campus and Hamilton location. The state has only six engineering technology programs, so your child won't find dramatically better options nearby, but the modest in-state ranking reflects how Ohio's top programs cluster around similar earnings levels.
For families seeking a practical engineering pathway with lower debt than traditional engineering degrees, this delivers. The strong national standing matters because engineering technology graduates often compete across state lines, and this credential punches well above its regional campus weight. The moderate sample size means data is reasonably stable, though individual outcomes will vary.
Where Miami University-Middletown Stands
Earnings vs. debt across all engineering technology bachelors's programs nationally
Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.
Earnings Distribution
How Miami University-Middletown graduates compare to all programs nationally
Miami University-Middletown graduates earn $69k, placing them in the 95th percentile of all engineering technology bachelors programs nationally.
Earnings Over Time
How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation
Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.
Compare to Similar Programs in Ohio
Engineering Technology bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Ohio (6 total in state)
| School | Earnings (1yr) | Earnings (4yr) | Median Debt | Debt/Earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami University-Middletown | $69,483 | $81,683 | $26,325 | 0.38 |
| Miami University-Hamilton | $69,483 | $81,683 | $26,325 | 0.38 |
| Miami University-Oxford | $69,483 | $81,683 | $26,325 | 0.38 |
| Kent State University at Tuscarawas | $45,477 | $51,742 | $27,000 | 0.59 |
| Kent State University at Kent | $45,477 | $51,742 | $27,000 | 0.59 |
| National Median | $60,529 | — | $26,325 | 0.43 |
Other Engineering Technology Programs in Ohio
Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Ohio schools
| School | In-State Tuition | Earnings (1yr) | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Miami University-Hamilton Hamilton | $7,278 | $69,483 | $26,325 |
| Miami University-Oxford Oxford | $17,809 | $69,483 | $26,325 |
| Kent State University at Tuscarawas New Philadelphia | $7,272 | $45,477 | $27,000 |
| Kent State University at Kent Kent | $12,846 | $45,477 | $27,000 |
About This Data
Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)
Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Miami University-Middletown, approximately 23% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.
Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.
Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.
Sample Size: Based on 67 graduates with reported earnings and 67 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.