Median Earnings (1yr)
$22,869
13th percentile (40th in OK)
Median Debt
$16,500
74% above national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.72
Manageable
Sample Size
2008
Adequate data

Analysis

This program presents significant concerns that should give any parent pause. With first-year earnings of just $22,869 and virtually no income growth over four years ($22,935), graduates earn substantially less than both the national median ($27,186) and Oklahoma state median ($25,843) for similar programs. The program ranks in only the 13th percentile nationally and 40th percentile within Oklahoma—meaning 87% of similar programs nationwide produce better-earning graduates.

While the debt load of $16,500 isn't catastrophic, it's notably higher than both state ($13,192) and national ($9,500) medians for this field. The debt-to-earnings ratio of 0.72 means graduates will likely struggle with loan payments on these low salaries. When you can earn $6,000+ more annually at nearby Tulsa Technology Center or Community Care College with similar training, the value proposition becomes questionable.

The high percentage of Pell Grant recipients (82%) suggests this program serves a predominantly low-income student population, but the outcomes don't justify the investment. Your child would be better served exploring the higher-performing programs in Oklahoma, particularly Tulsa Technology Center, which offers the same credential but delivers significantly better earning potential in the same local job market.

Where Miller-Motte College-Tulsa Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all allied health and medical assisting services certificate's programs nationally

Miller-Motte College-TulsaOther allied health and medical assisting services programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How Miller-Motte College-Tulsa graduates compare to all programs nationally

Miller-Motte College-Tulsa graduates earn $23k, placing them in the 13th percentile of all allied health and medical assisting services certificate programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in Oklahoma

Allied Health and Medical Assisting Services certificate's programs at peer institutions in Oklahoma (29 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
Miller-Motte College-Tulsa$22,869$22,935$16,5000.72
Tulsa Technology Center$29,723$25,745$14,8260.50
Community Care College$27,221$25,621$11,5580.42
Tulsa Community College$25,843$4,7500.18
Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester$19,440$19,828
National Median$27,186$9,5000.35

Other Allied Health and Medical Assisting Services Programs in Oklahoma

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Oklahoma schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Tulsa Technology Center
Tulsa
$29,723$14,826
Community Care College
Tulsa
$27,221$11,558
Tulsa Community College
Tulsa
$3,768$25,843$4,750
Kiamichi Technology Center-McAlester
McAlester
$19,440

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Miller-Motte College-Tulsa, approximately 82% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 2008 graduates with reported earnings and 2101 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.