Median Earnings (1yr)
$21,908
27th percentile (40th in NJ)
Median Debt
$25,975
3% above national median
Debt-to-Earnings
1.19
Elevated
Sample Size
166
Adequate data

Analysis

Rutgers-Camden's fine arts program starts rough but shows something unusual: graduates nearly double their earnings by year four. That first-year figure of $21,908 is concerning—below both national and state medians—but the jump to $38,282 represents 75% growth, pushing graduates above most of their New Jersey peers by the time early-career momentum builds.

The $25,975 in debt sits right at the state median, making the initial 1.19 debt-to-earnings ratio less alarming than it first appears. This isn't a low-debt program, but it's not an outlier either. The real question is what drives that earnings trajectory—whether graduates are landing better positions after building portfolios and connections, or simply aging into higher-paying work that may not require the degree at all. With 44% of students on Pell grants, this program serves a largely middle-class population where that initial earning period could be financially stressful.

For families comfortable with a slow financial start, the numbers suggest patience pays off. But compare that to Ramapo's fine arts grads earning $44,529, and you see the range of outcomes possible within the state. If your student is committed to fine arts specifically and Rutgers-Camden offers the right fit, the trajectory is promising. Just plan for those first few years to be lean.

Where Rutgers University-Camden Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all fine and studio arts bachelors's programs nationally

Rutgers University-CamdenOther fine and studio arts programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How Rutgers University-Camden graduates compare to all programs nationally

Rutgers University-Camden graduates earn $22k, placing them in the 27th percentile of all fine and studio arts bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in New Jersey

Fine and Studio Arts bachelors's programs at peer institutions in New Jersey (24 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
Rutgers University-Camden$21,908$38,282$25,9751.19
Ramapo College of New Jersey$44,529$41,385$25,0710.56
The College of New Jersey$33,214$48,408$25,0000.75
Monmouth University$29,353$49,388$27,0000.92
Rowan University$26,119$43,592$21,7080.83
Kean University$25,928$34,360$28,7501.11
National Median$24,742—$25,2951.02

Other Fine and Studio Arts Programs in New Jersey

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across New Jersey schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Ramapo College of New Jersey
Mahwah
$15,978$44,529$25,071
The College of New Jersey
Ewing
$18,685$33,214$25,000
Monmouth University
West Long Branch
$44,850$29,353$27,000
Rowan University
Glassboro
$15,700$26,119$21,708
Kean University
Union
$13,426$25,928$28,750

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Rutgers University-Camden, approximately 44% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 166 graduates with reported earnings and 185 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.