Analysis
UC Davis chemical engineering graduates start modestly but build strong momentum, with earnings jumping from $68,000 to over $90,000 within four years—a trajectory that outpaces the program's initial impression. While first-year earnings lag behind Berkeley and UCLA grads by $10,000-15,000, Davis graduates overtake the national median by year four and show one of the stronger growth curves in California's competitive chemical engineering landscape. The $16,000 median debt—among the lowest in the nation for this major—means graduates enter the workforce with minimal financial drag.
The state context matters here: Davis ranks exactly at California's median for chemical engineering starting salaries, placing it squarely middle-of-the-pack despite being below the national average. That's largely because California's other UC campuses dominate the field. What sets Davis apart is the debt picture. Most chemical engineering programs saddle students with $20,000-25,000 in loans; Davis keeps it to $16,000 while offering comparable earning potential to nearby UC Riverside.
For families weighing UC options, Davis represents a smart value play—especially if your student doesn't get into Berkeley or UCLA. The four-year earnings data suggests Davis graduates land solid industry positions with real advancement potential, and they're doing it with debt loads that won't constrain early-career decisions. At 42% admission rate versus Berkeley's single digits, it's also meaningfully more accessible.
Where University of California-Davis Stands
Earnings vs. debt across all chemical engineering bachelors's programs nationally
Earnings Distribution
How University of California-Davis graduates compare to all programs nationally
Earnings Over Time
How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation
| School | 1 Year | 4 Years | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of California-Davis | $68,337 | $90,820 | +33% |
| University of California-Berkeley | $81,553 | $108,067 | +33% |
| University of California-Los Angeles | $76,680 | $92,741 | +21% |
| University of Southern California | $68,234 | $89,986 | +32% |
| California State Polytechnic University-Pomona | $69,009 | $88,952 | +29% |
Compare to Similar Programs in California
Chemical Engineering bachelors's programs at peer institutions in California (14 total in state)
Scroll to see more →
| School | In-State Tuition | Earnings (1yr) | Earnings (4yr) | Median Debt | Debt/Earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,247 | $68,337 | $90,820 | $16,000 | 0.23 | |
| $14,850 | $81,553 | $108,067 | $18,155 | 0.22 | |
| $14,965 | $79,737 | $87,132 | $14,937 | 0.19 | |
| $13,747 | $76,680 | $92,741 | $18,205 | 0.24 | |
| $7,439 | $69,009 | $88,952 | $21,812 | 0.32 | |
| $14,170 | $68,245 | $80,354 | $17,413 | 0.26 | |
| National Median | — | $72,974 | — | $23,250 | 0.32 |
Career Paths
Occupations commonly associated with chemical engineering graduates
Architectural and Engineering Managers
Biofuels/Biodiesel Technology and Product Development Managers
Chemical Engineers
Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers
Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary
Engineers, All Other
Energy Engineers, Except Wind and Solar
Mechatronics Engineers
Microsystems Engineers
Photonics Engineers
Robotics Engineers
Nanosystems Engineers
About This Data
Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)
Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At University of California-Davis, approximately 31% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.
Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.
Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.
Sample Size: Based on 106 graduates with reported earnings and 94 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.