Median Earnings (1yr)
$31,789
52nd percentile (60th in MI)
Median Debt
$27,000
6% above national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.85
Manageable
Sample Size
24
Limited data

Analysis

Aquinas College's psychology program manages to achieve something noteworthy for a modest regional college: graduates here earn more than 60% of psychology programs in Michigan, with first-year earnings of $31,789 beating the state median by about $1,700. That difference—while not dramatic—matters when you're starting a career, and the relatively low debt load of $27,000 (lower than 75% of psychology programs nationally) keeps monthly payments manageable at around $300.

The earnings trajectory shows steady if unspectacular growth to $34,688 by year four, and the debt-to-earnings ratio of 0.85 sits in reasonable territory for a social science degree. However, these figures come with a significant caveat: the sample size is under 30 graduates, meaning a few outliers could be skewing the numbers in either direction. Still, the pattern aligns with what you'd expect from a solid regional program—graduates earning modestly above state averages without crushing debt burdens.

For a psychology major planning to work in Michigan after graduation, this represents a relatively safe bet compared to state alternatives. You're not paying premium prices for marginal outcomes, and you're avoiding the debt traps that plague many psychology programs. Just recognize that these earnings require either finding the right niche in the field or pursuing graduate education eventually, which most psychology careers demand anyway.

Where Aquinas College Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all psychology bachelors's programs nationally

Aquinas CollegeOther psychology programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How Aquinas College graduates compare to all programs nationally

Aquinas College graduates earn $32k, placing them in the 52th percentile of all psychology bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in Michigan

Psychology bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Michigan (36 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
Aquinas College$31,789$34,688$27,0000.85
Spring Arbor University$35,492$36,705$26,0000.73
Cornerstone University$34,505$33,591$37,8541.10
Rochester University$33,375$47,992$29,6870.89
Baker College$32,913$34,935$41,6881.27
University of Michigan-Dearborn$31,803$40,707$27,9770.88
National Median$31,482—$25,5000.81

Other Psychology Programs in Michigan

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Michigan schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Spring Arbor University
Spring Arbor
$32,580$35,492$26,000
Cornerstone University
Grand Rapids
$29,100$34,505$37,854
Rochester University
Rochester Hills
$27,938$33,375$29,687
Baker College
Owosso
$12,810$32,913$41,688
University of Michigan-Dearborn
Dearborn
$14,944$31,803$27,977

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Aquinas College, approximately 23% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 24 graduates with reported earnings and 31 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.