Median Earnings (1yr)
$36,536
63rd percentile (60th in PA)
Median Debt
$22,888
1% below national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.63
Manageable
Sample Size
16
Limited data

Analysis

Franklin and Marshall's environmental science graduates start modestly at $36,536, though that figure comes from fewer than 30 students, so it could swing considerably year to year. Still, the program performs respectably—ahead of both the Pennsylvania median ($33,069) and the national median ($33,988), landing near the 60th percentile in both comparisons. The debt load of $22,888 is reasonable, translating to a manageable 0.63 debt-to-earnings ratio that most graduates should be able to handle.

The real question is whether F&M's selective admissions (32% acceptance rate, 1394 SAT average) and likely higher sticker price justify this outcome. You're paying for a prestigious liberal arts education at a school where only 17% of students receive Pell grants, yet graduates are earning roughly $10,000 less than peers from Kutztown, a regional state university. The gap widens dramatically compared to Villanova ($56,549) or Bucknell ($46,698). For a family paying private school tuition, that's worth examining closely.

If your child is passionate about conservation and values F&M's teaching quality and alumni network for non-salary reasons, the debt level won't be crushing. But if maximizing early-career earnings matters—especially important in an environmental field where graduate school is common—Pennsylvania's public universities deliver similar or better outcomes at a fraction of the cost.

Where Franklin and Marshall College Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all natural resources conservation and research bachelors's programs nationally

Franklin and Marshall CollegeOther natural resources conservation and research programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How Franklin and Marshall College graduates compare to all programs nationally

Franklin and Marshall College graduates earn $37k, placing them in the 63th percentile of all natural resources conservation and research bachelors programs nationally.

Compare to Similar Programs in Pennsylvania

Natural Resources Conservation and Research bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Pennsylvania (55 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
Franklin and Marshall College$36,536—$22,8880.63
Villanova University$56,549———
Bucknell University$46,698$63,177$26,7980.57
Kutztown University of Pennsylvania$40,477$45,019$26,2500.65
Delaware Valley University$39,903—$27,0000.68
Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania$39,068$51,541$24,1250.62
National Median$33,988—$23,0100.68

Other Natural Resources Conservation and Research Programs in Pennsylvania

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Pennsylvania schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Villanova University
Villanova
$64,701$56,549—
Bucknell University
Lewisburg
$64,772$46,698$26,798
Kutztown University of Pennsylvania
Kutztown
$11,230$40,477$26,250
Delaware Valley University
Doylestown
$43,300$39,903$27,000
Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania
Shippensburg
$13,544$39,068$24,125

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Franklin and Marshall College, approximately 17% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 16 graduates with reported earnings and 20 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.