Analysis
UConn's natural resources conservation program starts rough but shows remarkable resilience. That first-year earning of $26,899 falls well below the national median of $33,988, landing in just the 11th percentile nationally. But by year four, graduates see 71% earnings growth to $46,035—well above both the national median and Connecticut's typical outcomes for this field.
The debt load of $22,692 is reasonable, with a 0.84 debt-to-earnings ratio that looks manageable if you can weather that difficult first year. Within Connecticut, this program actually performs at the 60th percentile, matching or beating every other in-state option including Yale. That state context matters: UConn is essentially the standard-bearer for natural resources careers in Connecticut, even if national comparison schools offer stronger immediate outcomes.
The real question is whether your child can handle lean early years—possibly supplemented by parental support or a second income source—while building toward a career that eventually pays off. The trajectory is encouraging for students committed to conservation work and willing to invest in professional development during those initial years. If immediate earnings are critical, this field typically requires patience regardless of the school, though UConn's eventual outcomes justify the wait better than most Connecticut alternatives.
Where University of Connecticut Stands
Earnings vs. debt across all natural resources conservation and research bachelors's programs nationally
Earnings Distribution
How University of Connecticut graduates compare to all programs nationally
Earnings Over Time
How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation
| School | 1 Year | 4 Years | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Connecticut | $26,899 | $46,035 | +71% |
| University of Connecticut-Waterbury Campus | $26,899 | $46,035 | +71% |
| University of Connecticut-Avery Point | $26,899 | $46,035 | +71% |
| University of Connecticut-Stamford | $26,899 | $46,035 | +71% |
| University of Connecticut-Hartford Campus | $26,899 | $46,035 | +71% |
Compare to Similar Programs in Connecticut
Natural Resources Conservation and Research bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Connecticut (14 total in state)
Scroll to see more →
| School | In-State Tuition | Earnings (1yr) | Earnings (4yr) | Median Debt | Debt/Earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $20,366 | $26,899 | $46,035 | $22,692 | 0.84 | |
| $64,700 | $32,909 | — | — | — | |
| $17,462 | $26,899 | $46,035 | $22,692 | 0.84 | |
| $17,462 | $26,899 | $46,035 | $22,692 | 0.84 | |
| $17,472 | $26,899 | $46,035 | $22,692 | 0.84 | |
| $17,452 | $26,899 | $46,035 | $22,692 | 0.84 | |
| National Median | — | $33,988 | — | $23,010 | 0.68 |
Career Paths
Occupations commonly associated with natural resources conservation and research graduates
Forestry and Conservation Science Teachers, Postsecondary
Environmental Science Teachers, Postsecondary
Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health
Climate Change Policy Analysts
Environmental Restoration Planners
Industrial Ecologists
Compliance Officers
Environmental Compliance Inspectors
Equal Opportunity Representatives and Officers
Government Property Inspectors and Investigators
Coroners
Regulatory Affairs Specialists
About This Data
Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)
Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At University of Connecticut, approximately 24% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.
Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.
Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.
Sample Size: Based on 89 graduates with reported earnings and 94 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.