Analysis
Clemson's agricultural business program delivers exactly what you'd hope for from a land-grant university: solid starting salaries, low debt, and steady income growth. With graduates earning just under $50,000 in their first year and nearly $59,000 by year four, this program outperforms 62% of similar agricultural business programs nationally—a meaningful edge in a field where many graduates start in the low $40,000s.
The financial picture is particularly strong. At $23,250 in median debt, graduates owe less than half their first-year salary, well below the concerning 1:1 ratio that creates payment stress. This ranks in the 7th percentile for debt nationally (meaning 93% of programs leave students with more debt), giving graduates breathing room to build their careers without being house-poor from loan payments. The 18% earnings growth over four years suggests real career progression rather than hitting a ceiling early.
For a state with limited options in this field—only two South Carolina schools offer this program—Clemson matches the state median exactly while providing the prestige and network of a selective university (38% admission rate, 1341 average SAT). If your child wants to work in agribusiness, farm management, or agricultural finance, this delivers practical value: manageable debt, competitive starting pay, and the kind of upward trajectory that makes the investment pay off.
Where Clemson University Stands
Earnings vs. debt across all agricultural business and management bachelors's programs nationally
Earnings Distribution
How Clemson University graduates compare to all programs nationally
Earnings Over Time
How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation
| School | 1 Year | 4 Years | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson University | $49,714 | $58,873 | +18% |
| Cornell University | $92,163 | $113,850 | +24% |
| California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo | $52,778 | $78,364 | +48% |
| University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign | $55,934 | $74,858 | +34% |
| Texas Tech University | $50,509 | $71,893 | +42% |
Compare to Similar Programs Nationally
Agricultural Business and Management bachelors's programs at top institutions nationally
Scroll to see more →
| School | In-State Tuition | Earnings (1yr) | Earnings (4yr) | Median Debt | Debt/Earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $15,554 | $49,714 | $58,873 | $23,250 | 0.47 | |
| $66,014 | $92,163 | $113,850 | $13,258 | 0.14 | |
| $8,302 | $61,152 | $59,416 | — | — | |
| $10,857 | $59,953 | $62,322 | $19,500 | 0.33 | |
| $14,130 | $58,335 | $59,013 | $17,499 | 0.30 | |
| $15,988 | $57,023 | $65,269 | $24,125 | 0.42 | |
| National Median | — | $48,338 | — | $20,000 | 0.41 |
Career Paths
Occupations commonly associated with agricultural business and management graduates
Economists
Environmental Economists
Farmers, Ranchers, and Other Agricultural Managers
Agricultural Sciences Teachers, Postsecondary
Economics Teachers, Postsecondary
Sales Representatives, Wholesale and Manufacturing, Except Technical and Scientific Products
Computer User Support Specialists
Buyers and Purchasing Agents, Farm Products
Farm and Home Management Educators
First-Line Supervisors of Office and Administrative Support Workers
First-Line Supervisors of Farming, Fishing, and Forestry Workers
About This Data
Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)
Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Clemson University, approximately 15% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.
Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.
Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.
Sample Size: Based on 98 graduates with reported earnings and 93 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.