Median Earnings (1yr)
$49,556
73rd percentile (60th in IN)
Median Debt
$26,000
7% above national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.52
Manageable
Sample Size
44
Adequate data

Analysis

Indiana State's marketing program graduates earn nearly $50,000 in their first year—above the national median and competitive within Indiana, where it ranks in the 60th percentile. The $26,000 debt load is reasonable, translating to a manageable 0.52 debt-to-earnings ratio that gives graduates breathing room early in their careers. While this doesn't match the elite earnings at Notre Dame or Purdue, it represents solid middle-tier performance at a fraction of those schools' selectivity pressures.

The challenge here is modest earnings growth: graduates see only a 5% increase from year one to year four, suggesting these early wages may largely stay put. Many marketing careers accelerate significantly with experience, but this pattern indicates ISU grads might need to change employers or industries to unlock bigger raises. That said, starting near $50,000 with relatively low debt means graduates aren't trapped—they have flexibility to make career moves without crushing loan payments.

For families prioritizing affordability and immediate employability, this program delivers. Your student won't graduate with crippling debt, and they'll earn a livable wage from day one. Just understand that rapid salary growth isn't built into this trajectory—career advancement will likely require intentional job-hopping or skill development beyond the degree itself.

Where Indiana State University Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all marketing bachelors's programs nationally

Indiana State UniversityOther marketing programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How Indiana State University graduates compare to all programs nationally

Indiana State University graduates earn $50k, placing them in the 73th percentile of all marketing bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in Indiana

Marketing bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Indiana (27 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
Indiana State University$49,556$51,935$26,0000.52
University of Notre Dame$63,906$73,166$19,0000.30
Butler University$60,438$61,624$26,0000.43
Purdue University-Main Campus$56,668—$19,2640.34
Trine University$51,244$63,152——
Trine University-Regional/Non-Traditional Campuses$51,244$63,152——
National Median$44,728—$24,2670.54

Other Marketing Programs in Indiana

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Indiana schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame
$62,693$63,906$19,000
Butler University
Indianapolis
$45,980$60,438$26,000
Purdue University-Main Campus
West Lafayette
$9,992$56,668$19,264
Trine University
Angola
$35,600$51,244—
Trine University-Regional/Non-Traditional Campuses
Angola
$9,576$51,244—

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Indiana State University, approximately 39% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 44 graduates with reported earnings and 41 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.