Median Earnings (1yr)
$52,374
84th percentile (80th in SC)
Median Debt
$23,750
2% below national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.45
Manageable
Sample Size
377
Adequate data

Analysis

USC-Columbia's marketing program significantly outperforms both national and state expectations, with first-year graduates earning $52,374—well above the national median of $44,728 and substantially higher than South Carolina's median of $37,066. Among marketing programs in South Carolina, this ranks in the 80th percentile, making it the clear leader among major state universities and competitive with Clemson's strong showing.

The financial picture is compelling: graduates carry reasonable debt loads of $23,750 (slightly below national averages) while earning considerably more than their peers elsewhere. The debt-to-earnings ratio of 0.45 means students can realistically expect to manage their debt burden, and earnings grow a healthy 19% by the fourth year to $62,400. This combination of strong starting salaries and manageable debt creates genuine financial advantage over other in-state options.

For anxious parents weighing USC's marketing program against alternatives, the data tells a straightforward story of solid value. Your child would graduate with earnings potential that exceeds most marketing programs nationally while staying close to home with reasonable tuition costs. The robust sample size of 100+ graduates gives confidence these aren't outlier results—USC consistently delivers strong marketing career outcomes that justify the investment.

Where University of South Carolina-Columbia Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all marketing bachelors's programs nationally

University of South Carolina-ColumbiaOther marketing programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How University of South Carolina-Columbia graduates compare to all programs nationally

University of South Carolina-Columbia graduates earn $52k, placing them in the 84th percentile of all marketing bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in South Carolina

Marketing bachelors's programs at peer institutions in South Carolina (17 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
University of South Carolina-Columbia$52,374$62,400$23,7500.45
Clemson University$47,606$62,978$23,2500.49
Limestone University$43,169—$27,0000.63
College of Charleston$40,723$56,514$22,2500.55
Anderson University$37,066$47,789$25,2500.68
Coastal Carolina University$35,924$53,971$26,0000.72
National Median$44,728—$24,2670.54

Other Marketing Programs in South Carolina

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across South Carolina schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Clemson University
Clemson
$15,554$47,606$23,250
Limestone University
Gaffney
$27,500$43,169$27,000
College of Charleston
Charleston
$12,978$40,723$22,250
Anderson University
Anderson
$33,580$37,066$25,250
Coastal Carolina University
Conway
$11,640$35,924$26,000

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At University of South Carolina-Columbia, approximately 19% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 377 graduates with reported earnings and 369 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.