Median Earnings (1yr)
$37,673
94th percentile (60th in MN)
Median Debt
$24,875
2% below national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.66
Manageable
Sample Size
77
Adequate data

Analysis

Winona State's psychology program significantly outperforms the national market—landing in the 94th percentile for earnings—but sits squarely in the middle of Minnesota's competitive psychology landscape. First-year graduates earn $37,673, about $6,200 more than the typical psychology grad nationally, though several Minnesota schools push closer to $41,000. The debt load of $24,875 is reasonable, translating to a manageable 0.66 ratio against first-year income, and graduates see healthy 20% earnings growth by year four.

The 60th percentile ranking within Minnesota tells the real story here. You're getting solid results at a regional public university with a 69% admission rate, but not top-tier outcomes. The program delivers better value than three-quarters of psychology programs nationwide, which matters if your student is considering out-of-state alternatives. Within Minnesota, though, schools like College of Saint Benedict and Metro State post notably stronger early earnings.

For families prioritizing affordability and steady career progression over maximizing first-year salary, this works. The debt is manageable, the earnings trajectory is positive, and outcomes substantially exceed national norms. Just understand you're paying for middle-of-the-pack results in a state with particularly strong psychology programs overall.

Where Winona State University Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all psychology bachelors's programs nationally

Winona State UniversityOther psychology programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How Winona State University graduates compare to all programs nationally

Winona State University graduates earn $38k, placing them in the 94th percentile of all psychology bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in Minnesota

Psychology bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Minnesota (31 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
Winona State University$37,673$45,294$24,8750.66
College of Saint Benedict$41,029$45,302$27,0000.66
Metropolitan State University$40,958$44,425$30,1550.74
Capella University$39,764$43,554$40,8161.03
University of Minnesota-Duluth$38,543$45,061$24,2250.63
University of St Thomas$38,396$51,174$27,0000.70
National Median$31,482—$25,5000.81

Other Psychology Programs in Minnesota

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Minnesota schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
College of Saint Benedict
Saint Joseph
$53,884$41,029$27,000
Metropolitan State University
Saint Paul
$9,780$40,958$30,155
Capella University
Minneapolis
$14,436$39,764$40,816
University of Minnesota-Duluth
Duluth
$14,318$38,543$24,225
University of St Thomas
Saint Paul
$52,284$38,396$27,000

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Winona State University, approximately 23% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 77 graduates with reported earnings and 114 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.