Median Earnings (1yr)
$38,524
95th percentile (80th in CA)
Median Debt
$43,875
72% above national median
Debt-to-Earnings
1.14
Elevated
Sample Size
432
Adequate data

Analysis

Ashford University's psychology program delivers exceptionally strong earnings that rank in the 95th percentile nationally and 80th percentile among California programs—impressive performance that places it among the state's top earners alongside much more prestigious institutions. At $38,524 in first-year earnings, graduates earn $8,000 more than the national median and nearly $8,000 above California's median for psychology programs.

However, this strong earning power comes with a significant cost burden. At $43,875 in median debt—more than double both national and state averages—students are paying premium prices for these outcomes. The debt load creates a concerning 1.14 debt-to-earnings ratio, meaning graduates carry debt equivalent to 14 months of their first-year salary. Additionally, earnings actually decline by 5% from year one to year four, suggesting the program may not build skills that lead to career advancement.

For psychology majors, this represents a high-cost, high-reward scenario where exceptional immediate earnings help justify the debt burden, but only if students can manage the substantial loan payments. The program works best for families who can afford to minimize borrowing or for students confident about pursuing graduate school where the strong foundational earnings could provide leverage.

Where Ashford University Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all psychology bachelors's programs nationally

Ashford UniversityOther psychology programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How Ashford University graduates compare to all programs nationally

Ashford University graduates earn $39k, placing them in the 95th percentile of all psychology bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in California

Psychology bachelors's programs at peer institutions in California (84 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
Ashford University$38,524$36,510$43,8751.14
University of Massachusetts Global$40,726$51,379$26,7030.66
The Chicago School at Los Angeles$39,596—$40,6451.03
Santa Clara University$38,587$58,545$17,6670.46
National University$38,523$54,307$31,2500.81
California State University-East Bay$37,702$53,636$15,0000.40
National Median$31,482—$25,5000.81

Other Psychology Programs in California

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across California schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
University of Massachusetts Global
Aliso Viejo
$12,520$40,726$26,703
The Chicago School at Los Angeles
Los Angeles
$20,844$39,596$40,645
Santa Clara University
Santa Clara
$59,241$38,587$17,667
National University
San Diego
$13,320$38,523$31,250
California State University-East Bay
Hayward
$7,055$37,702$15,000

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Ashford University, approximately 31% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 432 graduates with reported earnings and 736 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.