Median Earnings (1yr)
$74,753
35th percentile (40th in NY)
Median Debt
$22,500
8% below national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.30
Manageable
Sample Size
49
Adequate data

Analysis

Buffalo's Computer Engineering program lands squarely in the middle of the pack—below both the national and New York state medians for graduate earnings, but with manageable debt that's actually lower than typical. At $74,753 in first-year earnings, graduates trail the state median by about $6,000 and rank in just the 40th percentile among New York's 17 computer engineering programs. For context, RIT graduates start at $91,000 and even SUNY Binghamton beats Buffalo by $12,000.

The positive here is the debt picture: $22,500 is reasonable for any engineering degree, translating to a 0.30 debt-to-earnings ratio that won't burden new graduates. Earnings do grow 18% to $88,500 by year four, which is solid progression, though still lagging what other SUNY and private New York programs achieve right out of the gate. For a school with a 69% admission rate and strong engineering reputation, these numbers are underwhelming.

If your child has better options within the SUNY system—particularly Binghamton, which delivers $86,938 in starting earnings—those deserve serious consideration. Buffalo works if it's significantly cheaper or offers other compelling reasons (proximity to home, specific research interests), but purely from an ROI perspective, it's delivering below-average returns for New York computer engineering programs.

Where University at Buffalo Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all computer engineering bachelors's programs nationally

University at BuffaloOther computer engineering programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How University at Buffalo graduates compare to all programs nationally

University at Buffalo graduates earn $75k, placing them in the 35th percentile of all computer engineering bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in New York

Computer Engineering bachelors's programs at peer institutions in New York (17 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
University at Buffalo$74,753$88,500$22,5000.30
Columbia University in the City of New York$102,083———
Rochester Institute of Technology$90,829$105,334$28,5000.31
Binghamton University$86,938$97,721$23,9450.28
Syracuse University$84,793———
New York University$82,183$96,016$19,0000.23
National Median$78,952—$24,5000.31

Other Computer Engineering Programs in New York

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across New York schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Columbia University in the City of New York
New York
$69,045$102,083—
Rochester Institute of Technology
Rochester
$57,016$90,829$28,500
Binghamton University
Vestal
$10,363$86,938$23,945
Syracuse University
Syracuse
$63,061$84,793—
New York University
New York
$60,438$82,183$19,000

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At University at Buffalo, approximately 32% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 49 graduates with reported earnings and 53 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.