Median Earnings (1yr)
$68,791
95th percentile (95th in MI)
Median Debt
$26,000
136% above national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.38
Manageable
Sample Size
38
Adequate data

Analysis

Ferris State's automotive certificate isn't just above average—it's in a different league entirely. Graduates earn $68,791 in their first year, nearly double Michigan's median of $39,405 and almost twice the national benchmark. This isn't a marginal advantage; it's a premium outcome that places this program at the 95th percentile both nationally and within Michigan, handily outearning even Baker College's well-regarded program by over $29,000 annually.

The higher debt load of $26,000 (versus $11,000 statewide) might initially concern parents, but the earnings more than justify it. The debt-to-earnings ratio of 0.38 means graduates owe less than five months of their starting salary—exceptionally manageable. Earnings grow another 17% to over $80,000 by year four, suggesting strong career progression rather than a quick plateau.

This represents one of the clearest success stories in vocational education. While the program requires more upfront investment than community college alternatives, graduates immediately earn enough to make that debt trivial while building toward solid middle-class incomes. For students interested in automotive work, Ferris State has clearly cracked the code on industry connections and training quality that translates directly to superior wages.

Where Ferris State University Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all vehicle maintenance and repair technologies certificate's programs nationally

Ferris State UniversityOther vehicle maintenance and repair technologies programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How Ferris State University graduates compare to all programs nationally

Ferris State University graduates earn $69k, placing them in the 95th percentile of all vehicle maintenance and repair technologies certificate programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in Michigan

Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Technologies certificate's programs at peer institutions in Michigan (29 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
Ferris State University$68,791$80,314$26,0000.38
Baker College$39,719$45,404$5,5000.14
Universal Technical Institute-Canton$39,405$52,132$21,5700.55
Grand Rapids Community College$37,927$35,163$6,4600.17
Northern Michigan University$35,338—$11,0000.31
National Median$35,905—$11,0000.31

Other Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Technologies Programs in Michigan

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Michigan schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
Baker College
Owosso
$12,810$39,719$5,500
Universal Technical Institute-Canton
Canton
$17,252$39,405$21,570
Grand Rapids Community College
Grand Rapids
$4,059$37,927$6,460
Northern Michigan University
Marquette
$13,304$35,338$11,000

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Ferris State University, approximately 34% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 38 graduates with reported earnings and 47 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.