Marketing at Wilkes University
Bachelor's Degree
Analysis
Wilkes University's marketing program starts graduates below average but demonstrates something most programs don't: genuine momentum. That first-year salary of $42,038 sits in the bottom third nationally, but by year four, earnings jump 37% to $57,389—outpacing the typical trajectory for marketing graduates and landing closer to what schools like Drexel achieve.
The $26,000 in median debt matches Pennsylvania's average for marketing programs and represents a manageable burden at 62% of first-year earnings. While this program ranks around the 40th percentile among Pennsylvania's 55 marketing programs initially, the strong earnings growth suggests graduates are landing roles with advancement potential. This stands in notable contrast to Penn ($82,553) or Villanova ($69,633), but those schools serve different student populations and come with significantly higher costs.
The key question is whether that slower start matters for your student. If they can handle earning below the state median initially—perhaps living at home or in a lower-cost area—the upward trajectory offers real promise. The 91% admission rate means this is an accessible option, and the moderate debt load won't trap graduates in their starter roles. For families prioritizing affordability and growth potential over immediate high earnings, this program delivers reasonable value.
Where Wilkes University Stands
Earnings vs. debt across all marketing bachelors's programs nationally
Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.
Earnings Distribution
How Wilkes University graduates compare to all programs nationally
Wilkes University graduates earn $42k, placing them in the 33th percentile of all marketing bachelors programs nationally.
Earnings Over Time
How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation
Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.
Compare to Similar Programs in Pennsylvania
Marketing bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Pennsylvania (55 total in state)
| School | Earnings (1yr) | Earnings (4yr) | Median Debt | Debt/Earnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilkes University | $42,038 | $57,389 | $26,000 | 0.62 |
| University of Pennsylvania | $82,553 | $117,639 | $17,412 | 0.21 |
| Bucknell University | $70,868 | $71,936 | $26,000 | 0.37 |
| Villanova University | $69,633 | $79,586 | $26,962 | 0.39 |
| Drexel University | $57,838 | $68,543 | $27,000 | 0.47 |
| Lehigh University | $55,236 | $85,576 | $20,534 | 0.37 |
| National Median | $44,728 | — | $24,267 | 0.54 |
Other Marketing Programs in Pennsylvania
Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Pennsylvania schools
| School | In-State Tuition | Earnings (1yr) | Debt |
|---|---|---|---|
| University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia | $66,104 | $82,553 | $17,412 |
| Bucknell University Lewisburg | $64,772 | $70,868 | $26,000 |
| Villanova University Villanova | $64,701 | $69,633 | $26,962 |
| Drexel University Philadelphia | $60,663 | $57,838 | $27,000 |
| Lehigh University Bethlehem | $62,180 | $55,236 | $20,534 |
About This Data
Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)
Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Wilkes University, approximately 30% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.
Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.
Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.
Sample Size: Based on 31 graduates with reported earnings and 32 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.