Median Earnings (1yr)
$46,910
60th percentile (60th in FL)
Median Debt
$19,375
20% below national median
Debt-to-Earnings
0.41
Manageable
Sample Size
129
Adequate data

Analysis

Florida Gulf Coast's marketing program delivers something rare: above-average earnings with below-average debt. Starting at $46,910 and climbing to nearly $54,000 by year four, graduates earn more than the typical Florida marketing major ($43,772) and place solidly at the 60th percentile both statewide and nationally. More importantly, they're doing this with just $19,375 in debt—about $5,000 less than the state median and well below the national figure of $24,267.

The debt-to-earnings ratio of 0.41 means graduates owe less than half their first-year salary, a manageable starting point that allows for financial flexibility early in their careers. While FGCU doesn't match the elite Florida programs like UF ($56,454) or Miami ($53,622), it's competitive with Florida State ($49,808) and costs considerably less to achieve similar outcomes. The 15% earnings growth over four years suggests graduates are gaining traction in their careers rather than stalling out.

For families weighing in-state options, this represents a practical value proposition: solid middle-of-the-pack outcomes without the debt burden that often accompanies marketing degrees elsewhere. It won't catapult your child into the top tier of Florida marketing careers, but it provides a reasonable foundation without financial strain.

Where Florida Gulf Coast University Stands

Earnings vs. debt across all marketing bachelors's programs nationally

Florida Gulf Coast UniversityOther marketing programs

Programs in the upper-left quadrant (high earnings, low debt) offer the best value. Programs in the lower-right quadrant warrant careful consideration.

Earnings Distribution

How Florida Gulf Coast University graduates compare to all programs nationally

Florida Gulf Coast University graduates earn $47k, placing them in the 60th percentile of all marketing bachelors programs nationally.

Earnings Over Time

How earnings evolve from 1 year to 4 years after graduation

Earnings trajectories vary significantly. Some programs show strong early returns that plateau; others start lower but accelerate. Consider where you want to be at year 4, not just year 1.

Compare to Similar Programs in Florida

Marketing bachelors's programs at peer institutions in Florida (33 total in state)

SchoolEarnings (1yr)Earnings (4yr)Median DebtDebt/Earnings
Florida Gulf Coast University$46,910$53,802$19,3750.41
University of Florida$56,454$67,098$15,5740.28
University of Miami$53,622$71,357$19,0000.35
Florida Institute of Technology$52,158$31,0000.59
Florida Institute of Technology-Online$52,158$31,0000.59
Florida State University$49,808$62,764$18,2500.37
National Median$44,728$24,2670.54

Other Marketing Programs in Florida

Compare tuition, earnings, and debt across Florida schools

SchoolIn-State TuitionEarnings (1yr)Debt
University of Florida
Gainesville
$6,381$56,454$15,574
University of Miami
Coral Gables
$59,926$53,622$19,000
Florida Institute of Technology
Melbourne
$44,360$52,158$31,000
Florida Institute of Technology-Online
Melbourne
$12,240$52,158$31,000
Florida State University
Tallahassee
$5,656$49,808$18,250

About This Data

Source: U.S. Department of Education College Scorecard (October 2025 release)

Population: Graduates who received federal financial aid (Title IV grants or loans). At Florida Gulf Coast University, approximately 29% of students receive Pell grants. Students who did not receive federal aid are not included in these figures.

Earnings: Median earnings from IRS W-2 data for graduates who are employed and not enrolled in further education, measured 1 year after completion. Earnings are pre-tax and include wages, salaries, and self-employment income.

Debt: Median cumulative federal loan debt at graduation. Does not include private loans or Parent PLUS loans borrowed on behalf of students.

Sample Size: Based on 129 graduates with reported earnings and 110 graduates with debt data. Small samples may not be representative.